| Prehospital / arrival | Identify potential disabling deficit and exclude hypoglycemia. | Identify probable LVO and route to an EVT-capable pathway when system design supports it. | Establish accurate LKW, premorbid mRS, anticoagulant history, glucose, and BP. Obtain NCCT immediately; add CTA head/neck for suspected LVO without delaying lysis. ahajournals |
| 0–4.5 h | Class I: eligible patients with disabling AIS should receive either alteplase 0.9 mg/kg (maximum 90 mg) or tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg promptly. Benefit is greatest in the first 3 hours. | Class I EVT for eligible anterior-circulation LVO; do not withhold IVT because EVT is planned. | Target door-to-needle is 60 minutes or less. Give IVT first when indicated, then proceed directly to angiography—do not await clinical response. |
| 0–6 h | Standard IVT eligibility still depends on the 4.5-hour window. | EVT is indicated for eligible ICA or M1 occlusion and now includes selected large-core infarcts, including ASPECTS 3–5. | Avoid requiring CT perfusion in otherwise eligible early-window LVO; NCCT and CTA are usually sufficient for fast triage. ahajournals |
| 4.5–9 h or wake-up/unknown onset | Class IIa: IVT is reasonable with a favorable advanced-imaging profile: DWI-FLAIR mismatch or CT/MR perfusion mismatch demonstrating potentially salvageable tissue. | If LVO is present, assess independently for EVT eligibility. | This is an imaging-selected thrombolysis window, not simply a clock-based extension. |
| 6–16 h | IVT may be considered only in selected late presenters, especially when EVT is unavailable or unsuitable and favorable imaging is present. | Class I: EVT for appropriately selected anterior-circulation LVO patients, traditionally based on DAWN/DEFUSE-3-type clinical-core or perfusion-core mismatch. | Advanced imaging is central to late-window selection. |
| 16–24 h | Class IIb: IVT may benefit a narrow, imaging-selected LVO group; evidence is most relevant when EVT cannot be performed, rather than as routine bridging before EVT. | EVT remains reasonable in selected patients; original evidence was strongest with DAWN-type selection. | Assess core size, penumbra, collateral context, disability baseline, occlusion site, and feasibility of rapid reperfusion. |
| Up to 24 h: posterior circulation | No routine late IVT pathway without appropriate imaging-based selection. | The 2026 guidance supports EVT for selected basilar artery occlusion patients, particularly with NIHSS at least 10 and without extensive established infarction. ahajournals | Posterior-circulation imaging assessment should emphasize established brainstem injury and vascular confirmation, not NIHSS alone. |